How We Check Reviewer Eligibility for CHI 2027
Good news! We know that some authors are struggling to get DBLP into author profiles ahead of the deadline. We will be able to provide a few days grace on this. Please make sure you and your coauthors fix this by Monday, 14 Sept AOE. CHI 2027 asks every submission to commit four review-responsibility slots…
The CHI 2027 Submission Checklist
The CHI 2027 submission process differs in several respects from previous years. The restructured review model, the review responsibility slots, and the new paper-reviewer matching system have all been described in earlier posts on this blog, and the authoritative requirements are set out in the Call for Papers and the Papers Review Process page. Several…
AI-Assisted Tools in the CHI 2027 Papers Review Process: What They Do, What They Do Not Do, and How Humans Remain Responsible
Introduction In our recent post explaining the CHI 2027 Papers review process, we said we would pilot several AI-assisted and automated tools. We also said we would provide more information about those tools. This blog post aims to serve that purpose by covering questions such as: What exactly are these tools doing? What information do…
Submitting a CHI 2027 paper means sharing responsibility for peer review
Peer review only works when peers review. Every CHI paper depends on members of our community reading submissions carefully, providing constructive feedback, and helping the conference reach fair and well-reasoned decisions. As CHI has grown, however, this work has increasingly fallen on a relatively small group of volunteers. That is neither fair to those volunteers…
How the CHI 2027 Papers Review Process Will Work
This blog post aims to explain what has changed in the CHI 2027 paper review process and provide justification for those changes. CHI is growing. That growth reflects the vitality, breadth, and global relevance of HCI. It also means that the review process must evolve so that it remains fair, sustainable, rigorous, and respectful of…
Finding the Right Reviewers: Building a New Paper-Reviewer Matching System for CHI Papers
A central goal of the CHI papers review process is to find the right reviewers for each paper. By “right,” we mean reviewers who meet the minimum qualifications for reviewers and who have the appropriate expertise to review the paper - both topically and methodologically. A good reviewer match is not just someone who knows…